CIMA DI MOLA
Sensory profile and fatty acid composition defined by 16 EVOO samples of CIMA DI MOLA in 14 years and come from 1 region.
Data of variety CIMA DI MOLA are related to years (in brackets the number of samples in each year): [2007 (1)] [2008 (1)] [2013 (1)] [2014 (1)] [2015 (1)] [2016 (1)] [2017 (1)] [2018 (1)] [2019 (1)] [2020 (1)] [2021 (2)] [2022 (2)] [2023 (1)] [2024 (1)] .Sensory profile
Sensory profile description Oils characterized by medium/high olive fruity with grass/leaf, fresh almond and artichoke notes, light flavor of tomato, medium/high intensity of bitter and pungency taste.
Belong to this typology: [ASCOLANA DURA] [BIANCHERA] [CIMA DI MOLA] [INTOSSO] [LECCIO DEL CORNO] [MORAIOLO] [NOSTRALE DI RIGALI] [NOSTRANA DI BRISIGHELLA] [OLIVA ROSSA] [PICHOLINE] [PISCIOTTANA] [ROSSELLINO]
Sensory profile and confidence limit of the mean (95%)
Fatty acids composition
Statistical moments of fatty acids composition (n=16)
Mean | Min | Max | Standarddeviation | |
Eicosenoic acid (%) | 0.25 | 0.22 | 0.28 | 0.02 |
Eicosanoic acid (%) | 0.34 | 0.18 | 0.41 | 0.05 |
Heptadecenoic acid (%) | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.19 | 0.03 |
Heptadecanoic acid (%) | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.32 | 0.07 |
Linoleic acid (%) | 8.95 | 7.71 | 12.83 | 1.22 |
Linolenic acid (%) | 0.63 | 0.53 | 0.83 | 0.08 |
Oleic acid (%) | 70.93 | 66.44 | 72.71 | 1.82 |
Palmitic acid (%) | 14.94 | 11.27 | 18.05 | 1.37 |
Palmitoleic acid (%) | 1.76 | 1.22 | 2.76 | 0.40 |
Stearic acid (%) | 1.91 | 1.20 | 2.28 | 0.27 |
Total phenols (mg/kg)The total phenolic content was determined using the spectrophotometric Folin–Ciocalteu method. Data were expressed as mg of caffeic acid equivalent per kg of EVOO (from 2022). | 521 | 295 | 694 | 144 |
Total phenols (mg/kg)The total phenolic content was determined using the spectrophotometric Folin–Ciocalteu method. Data were expressed as mg of gallic acid equivalent per kg of EVOO (until 2021). | 947 | 355 | 1,327 | 290 |